Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Validity and sensitivity to change of the semi-quantitative OMERACT ultrasound scoring system for tenosynovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Comparison of treatment retention and response to secukinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The impact of seropositivity on the effectiveness of biologic anti-rheumatic agents: results from a collaboration of 16 registries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. OMERACT definition and reliability assessment of chronic ultrasound lesions of the axillary artery in giant cell arteritis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Seasonal variation in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in Eastern Denmark from 1990-2018

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. EULAR recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the metric properties of the semi-quantitative OMERACT US scoring system vs a novel quantitative US scoring system for tenosynovitis, by testing its intra- and inter-reader reliability, sensitivity to change and comparison with clinical tenosynovitis scoring in a 6-month follow-up study.

METHODS: US and clinical assessments of the tendon sheaths of the clinically most affected hand and foot were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months in 51 patients with RA. Tenosynovitis was assessed using the semi-quantitative scoring system (0-3) proposed by the OMERACT US group and a new quantitative US evaluation (0-100). A sum for US grey scale (GS), colour Doppler (CD) and pixel index (PI), respectively, was calculated for each patient. In 20 patients, intra- and inter-observer agreement was established between two independent investigators. A binary clinical tenosynovitis score was performed, calculating a sum score per patient.

RESULTS: The intra- and inter-observer agreements for US tenosynovitis assessments were very good at baseline and for change for GS and CD, but less good for PI. The smallest detectable change was 0.97 for GS, 0.93 for CD and 30.1 for PI. The sensitivity to change from month 0 to 6 was high for GS and CD, and slightly higher than for clinical tenosynovitis score and PI.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement between two investigators for the OMERACT US scoring system for tenosynovitis and a high ability to detect changes over time. Quantitative assessment by PI did not add further information.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRheumatology (Oxford, England)
Volume55
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)2156-66
Number of pages11
ISSN1462-0324
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

ID: 49685716