Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Tailored antiplatelet therapy to improve prognosis in patients exhibiting clopidogrel low-response prior to percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Metabolic Systems Analysis of Shock-Induced Endotheliopathy (SHINE) in Trauma: A New Research Paradigm

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Coronary risk of patients with valvular heart disease: prospective validation of CT-Valve Score

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Vascular function in adults with cyanotic congenital heart disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Fractional Flow Reserve Guided PCI in Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: a DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Sub-study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Abstract Aim: To investigate whether an intensified antiplatelet regimen could improve prognosis in stable or non-ST elevation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients exhibiting high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a wide variability in the platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and HTPR has been associated with a poor prognosis. Methods: In this observational study, 923 consecutive patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and adequately pre-treated with clopidogrel were screened for HTPR with multiple electrode aggregometry after assessment of the coronary anatomy. Patients were grouped based on their response to clopidogrel and the assigned antiplatelet strategy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Results: HTPR was demonstrated in 237 patients (25.7%). Of these, 114 continued on conventional clopidogrel therapy, while the remaining 123 received intensified antiplatelet therapy with either double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily, n = 55) or the newer P2Y12-inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 68) for at least 30 days after the index procedure. The median follow-up was 571 days (interquartile range, 373-746). Intensifying antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of the composite endpoint (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, HTPR in combination with conventional clopidogrel therapy remained independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR), 2.92; 95% CI, 1.90-4.48), whereas intensified treatment reduced the risk to a level equivalent to that of patients exhibiting normal platelet reactivity (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.59-1.99). Conclusion: Tailored antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the event rate in patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPlatelets (London)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
ISSN0953-7104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2014

ID: 44731637