Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Survey by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology on screening for gestational diabetes in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Endometrial scratch injury with office hysteroscopy before IVF/ICSI: A randomised controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Predictors of emergency cesarean section in women with preexisting diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Routine use of antenatal nonstress tests in pregnant women with diabetes-What is the practice?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. High maternal age at first and subsequent child births in Denmark in the mid-1800s-Letter to the editor

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Katrien Benhalima
  • Chantal Mathieu
  • André Van Assche
  • Peter Damm
  • Roland Devlieger
  • Tahir Mahmood
  • Fidelma Dunne
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: More uniformity is necessary in screening and diagnosis for gestational diabetes (GDM) across Europe. The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) has recently recommended to use the 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of GDM. We evaluated the uptake of these EBCOG recommendations in guidelines for GDM screening across Europe.

METHODS: Between September and November 2015, an online survey on the current national or regional recommendations for GDM screening was directed to the 33 European countries that are members of EBCOG.

RESULTS: There was a response rate of 84.8% (28 countries). From Belgium, data were separately obtained from the Dutch-and the French-speaking parts and from the UK data were also obtained from Scotland, leading to data from 30 responders. The response rates were high in Central Europe (100%), Northern Europe (100%) and Southern Europe (85.7%) with lower response rates in Eastern Europe (71.4%). 82.1% of guidelines recommend screening for unknown diabetes at first prenatal visit and 67.9% recommend to screen for GDM before 24 weeks of pregnancy. All guidelines recommend to screen for GDM ≥24 weeks, based on risk factors in 64.3% and by universal screening in 35.7%. The most commonly used diagnostic criteria for GDM are the 2013 WHO criteria in 67.9%, the 1999 WHO criteria in 10.7%, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes criteria in 7.1% and the Carpenter & Coustan criteria in 7.1%. Of all societies advising the use of the 2013 WHO criteria, 52.6% recommends this based on risk factors, 10.5% recommends universal screening in a two-step strategy and 36.8% recommends a universal one-step approach with a 75g OGTT.

CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows that the majority of European societies now advise to use the 2013 WHO criteria for GDM. However, only 36.8% recommends a universal one-step approach with a 75g OGTT with the majority of societies recommending screening based on risk factors. The use of common diagnostic criteria for GDM by the majority of societies is an important first step towards achieving uniformity in GDM screening across Europe.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
Volume201
Pages (from-to)197-202
Number of pages6
ISSN0301-2115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 49877239