Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Scheuermann's Kyphosis: a 39-year follow-up from diagnosis in non-operated patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Evaluation of a new sagittal classification system in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Revision risk after pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a nationwide study with 2-year follow-up

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Are Modic Changes Associated With Health-related Quality of Life After Discectomy: A Study on 620 Patients With Two-year Follow-up

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Distraction-to-stall Versus Targeted Distraction in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

HYPOTHESIS: Fusing shorter than the last touched vertebra (LTV) is a safe approach in flexible main thoracic (MT) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves.

METHODS: This was a prospective study on consecutive AIS patients surgically treated with selective fusion of the MT curve. Fusion-level selection was based on the fulcrum-bending radiograph method. Patients were grouped based on the position of the lowest instrumented vertebra as proximal to the LTV (proxLTV, n = 43), at the LTV (atLTV, n = 45), and distal to the LTV (distLTV, n = 21).

RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study. Preoperatively, the distLTV group had greater lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical translation, and less flexibility in the MT curve. At 2-year follow-up, the groups did not differ in MT curve correction, but the distLTV had larger lumbar Cobb angle, more apical translation, and worse coronal balance. Distal adding-on was observed in 11 patients (26%) in the proxLTV group, four patients (9%) in the atLTV group, and one patient (5%) in the distLTV group (p = 0.031). Adding-on was associated with younger patients and lower Risser grade at the time of surgery but not with any other radiographic parameter. No differences in SRS-22r scores were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fusion carries the risk of adding-on, but leaving unfused segments in the lower spine increases the potential for compensatory mechanisms to improve spinal and truncal balance. In mature patients with a flexible MT curve, surgeons may consider fusion at or cranial to the LTV.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
Volume29
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)2018-2024
Number of pages7
ISSN0940-6719
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 62386914