Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Screening mammography: benefit of double reading by breast density

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Risk of breast cancer among women with benign ovarian tumors: a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Sentinel and non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with microinvasive breast cancer: a nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Mortality after contralateral breast cancer in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Pre-diagnostic changes in body mass index and mortality among breast cancer patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Change in mammographic density across birth cohorts of Dutch breast cancer screening participants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mammographic Density and Screening Sensitivity, Breast Cancer Incidence and Associated Risk Factors in Danish Breast Cancer Screening

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Regular physical activity and mammographic density: a cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • My von Euler-Chelpin
  • Martin Lillholm
  • George Napolitano
  • Ilse Vejborg
  • Mads Nielsen
  • Elsebeth Lynge
View graph of relations

PURPOSE: The currently recommended double reading of all screening mammography examinations is an economic burden for screening programs. The sensitivity of screening is higher for women with low breast density than for women with high density. One may therefore ask whether single reading could replace double reading at least for women with low density. We addressed this question using data from a screening program where the radiologists coded their readings independently.

METHODS: Data include all screening mammography examinations in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 November 2012 to 31 December 2013. Outcome of screening was assessed by linkage to the Danish Pathology Register. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, number of interval cancers, and false positive-tests per 1000 screened women by both single reader and consensus BI-RADS density code.

RESULTS: In total 54,808 women were included. The overall sensitivity of double reading was 72%, specificity was 97.6%, 3 women per 1000 screened experienced an interval cancer, and 24 a false-positive test. Across all BI-RADS density codes, single reading consistently decreased sensitivity as compared with consensus reading. The same was true for specificity, apart from results across BI-RADS density codes set by reader 2.

CONCLUSIONS: Single reading decreased sensitivity as compared with double reading across all BI-RADS density codes. This included results based on consensus BI-RADS density codes. This means that replacement of double with single reading would have negative consequences for the screened women, even if density could be assessed automatically calibrated to the usual consensus level.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume171
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)767-776
Number of pages10
ISSN0167-6806
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Research areas

  • Aged, Breast Density/physiology, Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis, Denmark/epidemiology, Early Detection of Cancer, Female, Humans, Mammography, Mass Screening, Middle Aged

ID: 55811632