Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Emergency admissions for complicated colonic diverticulitis are increasing: a nationwide register-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Risk factors for recurrence after acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Disease pattern in Danish patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Prediction of ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn using pre- and perinatal quantification of maternal anti-A/anti-B IgG titer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Impact of long-term storage of plasma and cell-free DNA on measured DNA quantity and fetal fraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. External quality assessment of noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Next Generation Sequencing-Based Fetal ABO Blood Group Prediction by Analysis of Cell-Free DNA from Maternal Plasma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Targeted Rhesus immunoglobulin for RhD negative women undergoing an induced abortion: a clinical pilot study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Patients with a defunctioning ileostomy after rectal resection experience substantial ileostomy-related morbidity and decreased quality of life. Early reversal of the defunctioning ileostomy has been proposed as a method of mitigating these problems. We aimed to evaluate the safety of early ileostomy closure within 6 weeks.

METHOD: Randomized controlled trials investigating the safety of early ileostomy closure were identified through a systematic search and review of the current literature. Meta-analysis of the extracted outcome data was performed, and the methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed.

RESULTS: The search identified six eligible studies yielding a total of 528 patients, with 269 in the early closure (EC) group and 259 in the standard closure (SC) group. Major complications in the EC group was 5.2% compared with 3.6% in the SC group (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.33-3.79). Anastomotic leakage in the EC group was 3.3% compared with 3.5% in the SC group (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.29-2.75). The meta-analysis resulted in no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION: This review was not able to discern a statistically significant difference in postoperative complications when comparing early and standard ileostomy closure. The current literature indicates that early ileostomy closure is not associated with higher complication rates in patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course and radiologically verified intact distal anastomosis after index surgery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease
Volume36
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)203-212
Number of pages10
ISSN0179-1958
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

    Research areas

  • Colorectal cancer, Ileostomy closure, Loop ileostomy, Rectal resection

ID: 61811239