Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in routine care with abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab in Denmark and Sweden

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. How do people with rheumatoid arthritis experience participation in a smoking cessation trial: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Rheumatoid arthritis and risk of spontaneous abortion: a Danish nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Adherence to Treat-to-Target Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Associated Factors: Data from the International RA BIODAM Cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To estimate (1) crude and age-and gender-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) of serious infections (SI) and (2) relative risks (RR) of SI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating treatment with abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab in routine care.

METHODS: This is an observational cohort study conducted in parallel in Denmark and Sweden including patients with RA in Denmark (DANBIO) and Sweden (Anti-Rheumatic Treatment in Sweden Register/Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register) who started abatacept/rituximab/tocilizumab in 2010-2015. Patients could contribute to more than one treatment course. Incident SI (hospitalisations listing infection) and potential confounders were identified through linkage to national registries. Age- and gender-adjusted IRs of SI per 100 person years and additionally adjusted RRs of SI during 0-12 and 0-24 months since start of treatment were assessed (Poisson regression). Country-specific RRs were pooled using inverse variance weighting.

RESULTS: We identified 8987 treatment courses (abatacept: 2725; rituximab: 3363; tocilizumab: 2899). At treatment start, rituximab-treated patients were older, had longer disease duration and more previous malignancies; tocilizumab-treated patients had higher C reactive protein. During 0-12 and 0-24 months of follow-up, 456 and 639 SI events were identified, respectively. The following were the age- and gender-adjusted 12-month IRs for abatacept/rituximab/tocilizumab: 7.1/8.1/6.1 for Denmark and 6.0/6.4/4.7 for Sweden. The 24-month IRs were 6.1/7.5/5.2 for Denmark and 5.6/5.8/4.3 for Sweden. Adjusted 12-month RRs for tocilizumab versus rituximab were 0.82 (0.50 to 1.36) for Denmark and 0.76 (0.57 to 1.02) for Sweden, pooled 0.78 (0.61 to 1.01); for abatacept versus rituximab 0.94 (0.55 to 1.60) for Denmark and 0.86 (0.66 to 1.13) for Sweden, pooled 0.88 (0.69 to 1.12); and for abatacept versus tocilizumab 1.15 (0.69 to 1.90) for Denmark and 1.14 (0.83 to 1.55) for Sweden, pooled 1.13 (0.91 to 1.42). The adjusted RRs for 0-24 months were similar.

CONCLUSION: For patients starting abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab, differences in baseline characteristics were seen. Numerical differences in IR of SI between drugs were observed. RRs seemed to vary with drug (tocilizumab < abatacept < rituximab) but should be interpreted with caution due to few events and risk of residual confounding.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume78
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)320-327
Number of pages8
ISSN0003-4967
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Bibliographical note

COPECARE

    Research areas

  • Abatacept/adverse effects, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects, Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects, Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy, Denmark/epidemiology, Female, Humans, Infections/chemically induced, Male, Poisson Distribution, Registries, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Rituximab/adverse effects, Sweden/epidemiology

ID: 58910242