Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Reliable test of clinicians' mastery in skin cancer diagnostics

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Measured and genetically predicted plasma YKL-40 levels and melanoma mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Targeted ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology for sentinel node diagnostics in early-stage melanoma: a validation study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Recurrence and survival after neck dissections in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Niels Kvorning Ternov
  • T Vestergaard
  • L Rosenkrantz Hölmich
  • K Karmisholt
  • Lene Wagenblast
  • H Klyver
  • M Hald
  • L Schøllhammer
  • L Konge
  • A H Chakera
View graph of relations

Differentiating between benign and malignant skin lesions can be very difficult and should only be done by sufficiently trained and skilled clinicians. To our knowledge there are no validated tests for reliable assessments of clinicians' ability to perform skin cancer diagnostics. To develop and gather validity evidence for a test in skin cancer diagnostics, a multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) was developed based on informal interviews with seven content experts from five skin cancer centers in Denmark. Validity evidence for the test was gathered from May until July 2019 using Messick's validity framework (content, response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables and consequences). Item content was revised through a Delphi-like review process and then piloted on 36 medical students and 136 doctors using a standardized response process. Results enabled an analysis of the internal structure and relationship to other variables of the test. Finally, the contrasting groups method was used to investigate the test's consequences (pass-fail standard). The initial 90-item MCQ was reduced to 40 items during the Delphi-like review process. Item analysis revealed that 25 of the 40 selected items were level I-III quality items with a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83) and highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001) differences in test scores between participants with different occupations or levels of experience. A pass-fail standard of 12 (48%) correct answers was established using the contrasting groups' method. The skin cancer diagnostics MCQ developed in this study can be used for reliable assessments of clinicians' competencies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of Dermatological Research
Volume313
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)235-243
Number of pages9
ISSN0340-3696
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

    Research areas

  • Continuous medical education, Melanoma, Nevi, Skin cancer

ID: 61227423