Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Long-term monitoring of intracranial pressure in freely-moving rats; impact of different physiological states

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. B waves: a systematic review of terminology, characteristics, and analysis methods

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Preclinical update on regulation of intracranial pressure in relation to idiopathic intracranial hypertension

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Initial experience with the Codman Certas adjustable valve in the management of patients with hydrocephalus

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Hydrocephalus induces dynamic spatiotemporal regulation of aquaporin-4 expression in the rat brain

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Hypophosphataemia is common in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Endoskopisk behandling af hydrocefalus

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. B-waves are present in patients without intracranial pressure disturbances

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Although widely used in the evaluation of the diseased, normal intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure remain sparsely documented. Intracranial pressure is different from lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. In addition, intracranial pressure differs considerably according to the body position of the patient. Despite this, the current reference values do not distinguish between intracranial and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressures, and body position-dependent reference values do not exist. In this study, we aim to establish these reference values.

METHOD: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Sciences. Methodological quality was assessed using an amended version of the Joanna Briggs Quality Appraisal Checklist. Intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were independently evaluated and subdivided into body positions. Quantitative data were presented with mean ± SD, and 90% reference intervals.

RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. Nine studies reported values for intracranial pressure, while 27 reported values for the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Reference values for intracranial pressure were -  5.9 to 8.3 mmHg in the upright position and 0.9 to 16.3 mmHg in the supine position. Reference values for lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were 7.2 to 16.8 mmHg and 5.7 to 15.5 mmHg in the lateral recumbent position and supine position, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review is the first to provide position-dependent reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Clinically applicable reference values for normal lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were established, and are in accordance with previously used reference values. For intracranial pressure, this study strongly emphasizes the scarcity of normal pressure measures, and highlights the need for further research on the matter.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFluids and Barriers of the CNS
Volume18
Issue number1
Number of pages10
ISSN2045-8118
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2021

    Research areas

  • CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid pressure, ICP, Intracranial pressure, Reference intervals, Reference values

ID: 65315366