Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Providing relevant information to pregnant women about induction of labor at term is essential. A Reply

Research output: Other contributionResearch

DOI

  1. Prediction of ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn using pre- and perinatal quantification of maternal anti-A/anti-B IgG titer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Adherence to guidelines on red blood cell transfusions in women having post-partum haemorrhage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Is cesarean section a cause of affective disorders?-A national cohort study using sibling designs

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Next Generation Sequencing-Based Fetal ABO Blood Group Prediction by Analysis of Cell-Free DNA from Maternal Plasma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

We are grateful for the opportunity to reply to the comments to our paper on maternal age and risk on cesarean section (CS) in induced labor at term in the Nordic countries (1) by Ole Bredahl Rasmussen (2). Rasmussen states that we conclude that women should be informed about a higher risk of CS if they have their labor induced compared with spontaneous labor. He underlines why a direct comparison of risk of CS risk in women in spontaneous labor with women having labor induced at any given gestational age around term, is irrelevant in a clinical setting for the patient (3). We completely agree with this reasoning. Our paper is focusing on the increasing risk of CS with increasing age among women having labor induced.

Original languageEnglish
Publication date2020
Edition8
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
SeriesActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN0001-6349
NullPointerException

ID: 64642908