Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Preparing for Emergency: A Valid, Reliable Assessment Tool for Emergency Cricothyroidotomy Skills

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. 3D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Training: A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Surgical Timing of the Orbital "Blowout" Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Panel 1: Epidemiology, natural history, and risk factors

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Panel 3: Recent advances in anatomy, pathology, and cell biology in relation to otitis media pathogenesis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Low-dose aspirin use and mortality risk in patients with head and neck cancer - a nationwide cohort study of 10,770 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Genomic Alterations in Human Papillomavirus-Positive and -Negative Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Emergency cricothyrodotomy (EC) is a lifesaving procedure. Evidence-based assessment of training effects and competency levels is relevant to all departments involved in emergency airway management. As most training uses low-fidelity models, the predictive value of good performance on such a model becomes relevant with regard to performance on a high-fidelity model (cadaver). This requires a valid assessment tool for EC performance.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study on low-fidelity models and human cadavers.

SETTING: University hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An assessment tool was created. Sixteen physicians (7 experienced surgeons and 9 novice physicians) performed an EC on a low-fidelity model and a cadaver. Two blinded raters assessed video recordings of performances using the assessment tool.

RESULTS: We found a high interrater reliability, based on a Pearson's r (0.81), and good evidence for validity, based on successfully distinguishing the 2 groups, using an independent samples t test (P < .001). We found a good correlation between performance on a low-fidelity model and the cadaver with an R(2) = 0.78.

CONCLUSION: The tool for assessing EC competence proved reliable and valid. Performance on a low-fidelity model measured this way is a good predictor of performance in a more lifelike situation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Volume152
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)260-5
ISSN0194-5998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

ID: 44868199