Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Nurses' and physicians' approaches to delirium management in the intensive care unit: A focus group investigation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Sleep and agitation during subacute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A scoping review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Influence of sedation on delirium recognition in critically ill patients: A multinational cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Physical activity after colorectal cancer surgery-a cross sectional study of patients with a long-term stoma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Impact of a Parastomal Bulge on Quality of Life - A Cross-sectional Study of Patients From the Danish Stoma Database

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings - a focus-group study of health care professionals

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common, but reliable evidence-based recommendations are still limited.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to explore nurses' and physicians' experiences and approaches to ICU delirium management.

METHOD: Our study had a qualitative multicentre design using interdisciplinary focus groups and framework analysis. Participants were strategically selected to include nurses and physicians with experience in delirium management at five ICUs in four out of five regions in Denmark.

RESULTS: We conducted eight focus group interviews with 24 nurses and 15 physicians; median ICU experience was 9 years (range 1-35). The main issues identified were (1) the decision to treat or not to treat ICU delirium based on delirium phenotype, (2) the decision to act based on experience or evidence, and (3) the decision to intervene using nursing care or medications. ICU delirium was treated with pharmacological interventions in patients with signs of agitation, hallucinations, and sleep deprivation. The first choice of agent was haloperidol or olanzapine. Agitated and combative patients received benzodiazepines, propofol, or dexmedetomidine. Calm delirious patients were managed with non-pharmacological solutions. Physicians recommended pro re nata (PRN) orders to prevent over medication, whereas nurses opposed PRN orders with the fear that it would increase their responsibilities.

CONCLUSION: Our study described an algorithm of contemporary delirium management in Danish ICUs based on qualitative inquiry. When evidence-based solutions are unclear, nurses and physicians rely on personal experience, collective experience, and best available evidence to determine which patients to treat and what methods to use to treat ICU delirium. Delirium management still needs clear objectives and guidelines with evidence-based recommendations for first-line treatment and subsequent treatment options.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses
Volume32
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)299-305
Number of pages7
ISSN1036-7314
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • Delirium, Focus groups, Hermeneutics, Intensive care unit, Nursing care, Pharmacological action, Qualitative research

ID: 56225379