Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

No central action of CGRP antagonising drugs in the GTN mouse model of migraine

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Neurofilament light chain as biomarker in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Genetic identification of cell types underlying brain complex traits yields insights into the etiology of Parkinson’s disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Letter to the editor regarding proposed new diagnostic criteria for migraine

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  3. Sumatriptan Does Not Antagonize CGRP-Induced Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Von Frey testing revisited - provision of an online algorithm for improved accuracy of 50% thresholds

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: Clinically, calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonising drugs are recognized as effective in migraine treatment, but their site of action is debated. Only a small fraction of these compounds pass the blood-brain barrier and accesses the central nervous system. Regardless, it has been argued that the central nervous system is the site of action. Here, we test this hypothesis by bypassing the blood-brain barrier through intracerebroventricular injection of calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonising drugs.

METHODS: We used the glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) mouse model, which is well validated by its response to specific migraine drugs. The calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist olcegepant and the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody ALD405 were administered either intraperitoneally or intracerebroventricularly. The outcome measure was cutaneous mechanical allodynia.

RESULTS: Mice given olcegepant intraperitoneally + GTN on day 1 had a mean 50% withdrawal threshold of 1.2 g in contrast to mice receiving placebo + GTN, which had a threshold of 0.3 g (p < 0.001). Similarly, in the ALD405 + GTN group, mice had thresholds of 1.2 g versus 0.2 g in the placebo + GTN group (p < 0.001). However, both drugs were ineffective when delivered intracerebroventricularly, as control and active groups had identical mechanical sensitivity thresholds, 0.2 g versus 0.1 g and 0.1 g versus 0.1 g for olcegepant and ALD405, respectively (p > 0.99 in both cases).

DISCUSSION: The site of action of olcegepant and of the monoclonal antibody ALD405 is outside the blood-brain barrier in this mouse model of migraine. It is likely that these results can be generalised to all gepants and all antibodies and that the results are relevant for human migraine.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCephalalgia : an international journal of headache
Volume40
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)924-934
Number of pages11
ISSN0333-1024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 60054621