Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Mental health indicators in pregnant women compared with women in the general population during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Reproductive changes among women in their 40s: A cross-sectional study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Home management by remote self-monitoring in intermediate- and high-risk pregnancies: A retrospective study of 400 consecutive women

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The impact of early pregnancy complications on completed family size-A nationwide, registry-based cohort study with 40 years of data

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The prognostic significance of HPV, p16, and p53 protein expression in vaginal cancer: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Feelings of guilt and loss of control dominate in stress and depression inventories from women with recurrent pregnancy loss

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Pregnancy loss and risk of multiple sclerosis and autoimmune neurological disorder: A nationwide cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The untapped potential of reproductive history in cardiovascular disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the associated regulations issued to minimize risk of disease transmission seem to have had an impact on general mental health in most populations, but it may have affected pregnant women even more because of pregnancy-related uncertainties, limited access to healthcare resources, and lack of social support. We aimed to compare the mental health response among pregnant women with that in similarly aged women from the general population during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: From April 14 to July 3, 2020, 647 pregnant women in their second trimester were enrolled in this study. For comparison, 858 women from the general Danish population (20–46 years) were sampled from an ongoing observational study. Participants responded to a questionnaire including six mental health indicators (concern level, perceived social isolation, quality of life, anxiety, mental health, and loneliness). Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Three-item Loneliness Scale and anxiety by the Common Mental Health Disorder Questionnaire 4-item Anxiety Subscale. Results: The pregnant women had better scores during the entire study period for all mental health indicators, and except for concerns, social isolation, and mental health, the differences were also statistically significant. Pregnant women were more concerned about becoming seriously ill (40.2% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.001), whereas the general population was more concerned about economic consequences and prospects. Many pregnant women reported negative feelings associated with being pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns regarding social isolation and regulation-imposed partner absence during hospital appointments and childbirth. All mental health indicators improved as Denmark began to reopen after the first wave of the pandemic. Conclusions: Pregnant women exhibited lower rates of poor mental health compared with the general population. However, they were more concerned about becoming seriously ill, expressed negative feelings about being pregnant during the pandemic, and were worried about the absence of their partner due to imposed regulations. These finding may be taken into account by policy-makers during pandemics to balance specific preventive measures over the potential mental health deterioration of pregnant women.

Original languageEnglish
Article number14258
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume100
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)2009-2018
Number of pages10
ISSN0001-6349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

© 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).

    Research areas

  • anxiety, coronavirus disease 2019, loneliness, mental health, pandemics, pregnancy, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, social isolation

ID: 67901084