Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Management practices for postdural puncture headache in obstetrics: a prospective, international, cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. MINS and postoperative haemoglobin: statistics versus reality?

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  2. Association between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neuronal injury or amyloidosis and cognitive decline after major surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty...how fast?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

  1. Onset time and duration of action of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg in patients above 80 years of age: A comparison with young adults

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the Management of Reproduction and Pregnancy in Women with Airways Diseases

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Smertebehandling og anæstesi ved fødslen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterEducationpeer-review

  4. Avanceret smertebehandling under fødslen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Sectio og Brugadas syndrom

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Accidental dural puncture is an uncommon complication of epidural analgesia and can cause postdural puncture headache (PDPH). We aimed to describe management practices and outcomes after PDPH treated by epidural blood patch (EBP) or no EBP.

METHODS: Following ethics committee approval, patients who developed PDPH after accidental dural puncture were recruited from participating countries and divided into two groups, those receiving EBP or no EBP. Data registered included patient and procedure characteristics, headache symptoms and intensity, management practices, and complications. Follow-up was at 3 months.

RESULTS: A total of 1001 patients from 24 countries were included, of which 647 (64.6%) received an EBP and 354 (35.4%) did not receive an EBP (no-EBP). Higher initial headache intensity was associated with greater use of EBP, odds ratio 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41) per pain intensity unit increase. Headache intensity declined sharply at 4 h after EBP and 127 (19.3%) patients received a second EBP. On average, no or mild headache (numeric rating score≤3) was observed 7 days after diagnosis. Intracranial bleeding was diagnosed in three patients (0.46%), and backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in the EBP group.

CONCLUSIONS: Management practices vary between countries, but EBP was more often used in patients with greater initial headache intensity. EBP reduced headache intensity quickly, but about 20% of patients needed a second EBP. After 7 days, most patients had no or mild headache. Backache, headache, and analgesic use were more common at 3 months in patients receiving an EBP.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume125
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1045-1055
Number of pages11
ISSN0007-0912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects, Blood Patch, Epidural/methods, Cohort Studies, Disease Management, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intracranial Hemorrhages/etiology, Middle Aged, Obstetrics/methods, Pain Measurement, Post-Dural Puncture Headache/therapy, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Young Adult

ID: 62004004