Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Maintaining Competence in Airway Management

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Long-term IV access in paediatrics - why, what, where, who and how

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  2. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Continuous peripheral perfusion index in patients admitted to hospital wards - An observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Association between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neuronal injury or amyloidosis and cognitive decline after major surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Anesthesiologists’ airway management expertise: Identifying subjective and objective knowledge gaps

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Ultrasound identification of the cricothyroid membrane: the new standard in preparing for front-of-neck airway access

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Airway management is a defining skill for anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesiologists must maintain and update these crucial skills throughout their career, but how this is best achieved remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify anaesthesiologists' procedural volume, confidence in airway management and their current and preferred future educational strategies.

METHODS: A questionnaire was developed consisting of 28 items exploring essential skills in airway management. All anaesthesiologists in the Capital Region of Denmark were invited to participate.

RESULTS: The response rate was 84% (240/285). Most anaesthesiologists felt competent to a high or very high degree in basic airway management. Anaesthesiologists from anaesthesia felt confident to a significantly higher degree than those working in the intensive care unit (ICU) regarding the practical aspects of airway management in both the anticipated difficult airway (93% vs 73%, P < .001) and the unanticipated difficult airway (81% vs 61%, P = .002). Both groups performed most of the key advanced techniques ≤4 times yearly, whereas anaesthesiologists from the ICU had a lower and less diverse procedural volume than those working in anaesthesia. The anaesthesiologists preferred training through their daily clinical work, hands-on workshops, and scenario-based simulation training. However, a large discrepancy was identified between the current and the desired level of training.

CONCLUSION: The anaesthesiologists felt competent to a high or very high degree in basic airway management but the current procedural volume in advanced airway management causes concern for skill maintenance. Furthermore, we found a gap between the current and the desired level of supplemental training.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume64
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)751-758
Number of pages8
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 59287772