Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Lifestyle interventions after ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Predictors of patient-reported outcomes at discharge in patients with heart failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Questionnaire measuring patient participation in health care: Scale development and psychometric evaluation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Facilitating transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the era of COVID-19: Recommendations for programmes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Dancing with atrial fibrillation - How arrhythmia affects everyday life of family members: A qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Risk factors of atrial fibrillation include diabetes, obesity and physical inactivity. Positive effects such as decreased atrial fibrillation burden have been reported for atrial fibrillation patients who have participated in lifestyle changing interventions after atrial fibrillation ablation treatment.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the evidence on the benefits and harms of lifestyle and risk factor management interventions in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

METHOD: Our systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Psychinfo, Web of Science and CENTRAL using key terms related to atrial fibrillation and lifestyle, including interventional trials. The primary outcomes were mortality and serious adverse events. Random effects meta-analyses of outcomes were conducted when appropriate.

RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials and two non-randomised interventional trials with a total of 498 patients were included. Six primary events were reported for the intervention groups and five events for the control groups (relative risk of 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3 to 3.1, I2 0%, P = 0.537). Effects in favour of the intervention groups were found for atrial fibrillation frequency (0.82 points, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.03, I2 87.3%, P = 0.005), atrial fibrillation duration (-0.76 points, 95% CI -1.64 to 0.12, I2 89.1%, P = 0.002) and body mass index (-5.40 kg/m2, 95% CI 6.22 to -2.57, I2 83.9%, P = 0.013). Risk of bias in the four studies was judged to be low to moderate.

CONCLUSION: Lifestyle changing interventions seem to have a positive effect on outcomes relevant to patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, but the included studies were small, interventions were inhomogeneous, and the quality of evidence was low to moderate. More studies are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)564-579
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

ID: 62443371