Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Inclusion of the value of herd immunity in economic evaluations of vaccines. A systematic review of methods used

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  1. Self-reported immunity and opinions on vaccination of hospital personnel among paediatric healthcare workers in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination at birth and differential white blood cell count in infancy. A randomised clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The impact of HPV multi-cohort vaccination: Real-world evidence of faster control of HPV-related morbidity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and infant mortality after quadrivalent HPV vaccination during pregnancy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Liv S Nymark
  • Tarang Sharma
  • Alexander Miller
  • Ulrika Enemark
  • Ulla Kou Griffiths
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review were to identify vaccine economic evaluations that include herd immunity and describe the methodological approaches used.

METHODS: We used Kim and Goldie's search strategy from a systematic review (1976-2007) of modelling approaches used in vaccine economic evaluations and additionally searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase for 2007-2015. Studies were classified according to modelling approach used. Methods for estimating herd immunity effects were described, in particular for the static models.

RESULTS: We identified 625 economic evaluations of vaccines against human-transmissible diseases from 1976 to 2015. Of these, 172 (28%) included herd immunity. While 4% of studies included herd immunity in 2001, 53% of those published in 2015 did this. Pneumococcal, human papilloma and rotavirus vaccines represented the majority of studies (63%) considering herd immunity. Ninety-five of the 172 studies utilised a static model, 59 applied a dynamic model, eight a hybrid model and ten did not clearly state which method was used. Relatively crude methods and assumptions were used in the majority of the static model studies.

CONCLUSION: The proportion of economic evaluations using a dynamic model has increased in recent years. However, 55% of the included studies used a static model for estimating herd immunity. Values from a static model can only be considered reliable if high quality surveillance data are incorporated into the analysis. Without this, the results are questionable and they should only be included in sensitivity analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Issue number49 Pt B
Pages (from-to)6828-6841
Number of pages14
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 52552678