Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Impact of surgical resection margins less than 5 mm in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of Burkitt lymphoma of the head and neck in a non-endemic region-a Danish nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The impact of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Danish translation of the Neck Dissection Impairment Index

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Genomic Alterations in Human Papillomavirus-Positive and -Negative Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Nasopharyngeal malignancies in Denmark diagnosed from 1980 to 2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Systematic review on the current knowledge and use of Single-cell RNA Sequencing in Head and Neck Cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Valid and Reliable Assessment of Upper Respiratory Tract Specimen Collection Skills during the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Examination of hearing loss among school-aged children in Greenland

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: The width of the surgical resection margin impacts recurrence and survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The most commonly used definition of a clear margin is one larger than 5 mm, although due to anatomical restrictions to e.g. bone or vessels, this size is not always feasible. Margins less than 5 mm affect postsurgical strategies and prognoses, and further knowledge of margins smaller than 5 mm is needed.Aims/objectives: We aimed to systematically review the literature on the impact of surgical resection margins less than 5 mm addressing recurrence and survival in OSCC.Methods/materials: A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases identifying studies regardless of publication date that examined margin less than 5 mm, with or without a comparison to size of 5 mm or greater, in patients with OSCC. We assessed the impact on recurrence and survival.Results: We identified six studies (n = 1514 patients); all studies, investigated recurrence, and three (n = 768 patients) evaluated survival. The studies had noteworthy variability in, e.g. follow-up times, anatomical sublocations, T- and N-stage classifications, and outcome measures. Five studies (n = 1387 patients) reported that margins smaller than 5 mm would be safe and would not affect survival or recurrence negatively compared to their own data on larger margins. One study reported that a clear resection margin greater than five mm was necessary to ensure optimal outcomes.Conclusion/significance: The literature showed significant bias and risk issues. In five of the included studies with 1387 patients, we found in selected cases, where margins larger than 5 mm are not possible, a tendency regarding resection margins less than 5 mm to be sufficient for the surgical treatment of patients with primary OSCC. However, the data is insufficient to enable altered recommendations of resection margins in patients with primary OSCC.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume140
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)869-875
Number of pages7
ISSN0001-6489
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Research areas

  • oral cavity, resection margin, squamous cell carcinoma, Systematic review

ID: 60285435