Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Distribution of concurrent training sessions does not impact endurance adaptation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Distribution of concurrent training sessions does not impact endurance adaptation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Measurement of peripheral arterial tonometry in patients with diabetic foot ulcers during courses of hyperbaric oxygen treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Repeated Wingate sprints is a feasible high-quality training strategy in moderate hypoxia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The age-related reduction in cerebral blood flow affects vertebral artery more than internal carotid artery blood flow

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Anders Kilen
  • Jonathan Bay
  • Jacob Bejder
  • Andreas Breenfeldt Andersen
  • Thomas Christian Bonne
  • Pernille Dyeremose Larsen
  • Andreas Carlsen
  • Jon Egelund
  • Lars Nybo
  • Abigail Louise Mackey
  • Niels Jacob Aachmann-Andersen
  • Jesper Løvind Andersen
  • Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg
  • Niels Vidiendal Olsen
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Military-, rescue- and law-enforcement personnel require a high physical capacity including muscular strength. The present study hypothesized that 9 weeks of volume matched concurrent short frequent training sessions increases strength more efficiently than less frequent longer training sessions.

DESIGN: A randomized training intervention study with functional and physiological tests before and after the intervention.

METHODS: Military conscripts (n=290) were assigned to micro-training (four 15-min strength and four 15-min endurance bouts weekly); classical-training (one 60-min strength and one 60-min endurance training session weekly) or a control-group (two 60-min standard military physical training sessions weekly).

RESULTS: There were no group difference between micro-training and classical-training in measures of strength. Standing long jump remained similar while shotput performance was reduced (P≤0.001) in all three groups. Pull-up performance increased (P≤0.001) in micro-training (7.4±4.6 vs. 8.5±4.0 repetitions, n=59) and classical-training (5.7±4.1 vs. 7.1±4.2 repetitions, n=50). Knee extensor MVC increased (P≤0.01) in all groups (micro-training, n=30, 11.5±8.9%; classical-training, n=24, 8.3±11.5% and control, n=19, 7.5±11.8%) while elbow flexor and hand grip MVC remained similar. Micro-training increased (P≤0.05) type IIa percentage from 32.5±11.0% to 37.6±12.3% (n=20) and control-group increased (P≤0.01) type IIax from 4.4±3.0% to 11.6±7.9% (n=8). In control-group type I, fiber size increased (P≤0.05) from 5121±959μm to 6481±2084μm (n=5). Satellite cell content remained similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Weekly distribution of low-volume concurrent training completed as either eight 15-min bouts or two 60-min sessions of which 50% was strength training did not impact strength gains in a real-world setting.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume23
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)999-1004
Number of pages6
ISSN1440-2440
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

    Research areas

  • Endurance Training/methods, Female, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Muscle Strength/physiology, Resistance Training/methods, Young Adult

ID: 62310271