Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Quality indicators for patients with traumatic brain injury in European intensive care units: a CENTER-TBI study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Influenza and associated co-infections in critically ill immunosuppressed patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Association between transfusion of blood products and acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Blood pressure and brain injury in cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Nanna L J Udesen
  • Ole K L Helgestad
  • Ann B S Banke
  • Peter H Frederiksen
  • Jakob Josiassen
  • Lisette O Jensen
  • Henrik Schmidt
  • Elazer R Edelman
  • Brian Y Chang
  • Hanne B Ravn
  • Jacob E Møller
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Concomitant vasoactive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving hemodynamic support with an axial flow pump (Impella CP).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of equipotent dosages of epinephrine, dopamine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine on cardiac work and end-organ perfusion in a porcine model of profound ischemic CS supported with an Impella CP.

METHODS: CS was induced in 10 pigs by stepwise intracoronary injection of polyvinyl microspheres. Hemodynamic support with Impella CP was initiated followed by blinded crossover to vasoactive treatment with norepinephrine (0.10 μg/kg/min), epinephrine (0.10 μg/kg/min), or dopamine (10 μg/kg/min) for 30 min each. At the end of the study, phenylephrine (10 μg/kg/min) was administered for 20 min. The primary outcome was cardiac workload, a product of pressure-volume area (PVA) and heart rate (HR), measured using the conductance catheter technique. End-organ perfusion was assessed by measuring venous oxygen saturation from the pulmonary artery (SvO2), jugular bulb, and renal vein. Treatment effects were evaluated using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression.

RESULTS: All catecholamines significantly increased LV stroke work and cardiac work, dopamine to the greatest extend by 341.8 × 103 (mmHg × mL)/min [95% CI (174.1, 509.5), p < 0.0001], and SvO2 significantly improved during all catecholamines. Phenylephrine, a vasoconstrictor, caused a significant increase in cardiac work by 437.8 × 103 (mmHg × mL)/min [95% CI (297.9, 577.6), p < 0.0001] due to increase in potential energy (p = 0.001), but no significant change in LV stroke work. Also, phenylephrine tended to decrease SvO2 (p = 0.063) and increased arterial lactate levels (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION: Catecholamines increased end-organ perfusion at the expense of increased cardiac work, most by dopamine. However, phenylephrine increased cardiac work with no increase in end-organ perfusion.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical care (London, England)
Volume24
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)95
Number of pages1
ISSN1466-609X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2020

    Research areas

  • Animals, Cardiac Output/drug effects, Catecholamines/therapeutic use, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Heart-Assist Devices, Hemodynamics/drug effects, Humans, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Norepinephrine, Phenylephrine, Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology, Swine

ID: 60124205