Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Financial conflicts of interest and outcomes and quality of systematic reviews (Protocol)

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  5. Cognitive training for prevention of cognitive impairment in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows:

The primary objectives are to investigate to what degree:

funding of systematic reviews by drug, device, and imaging companies and authors' other financial conflicts of interest are associated with effect size estimate; and

funding of systematic reviews by drug, device, and imaging companies and authors' other financial conflicts of interest are associated with conclusions that are favourable to the sponsor.

The secondary objective is to investigate to what degree:

funding of systematic reviews by drug, device, and imaging companies and authors' other financial conflicts of interest are associated with the methodological quality of systematic reviews as presented by the reviews
Original languageEnglish
JournalCochrane Database Syst Rev.
Volume12
Pages (from-to)MR000047
ISSN1361-6137
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

ID: 52616556