Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Treating critically ill anemic patients with erythropoietin: less is more

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinical validation of precision medicine protocols: the last mile is the longest

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  3. Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Effect of immunoglobulin G on cytokine response in necrotising soft-tissue infection: a post-hoc analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Ischaemic vascular disease and long-term mortality in emergency abdominal surgical patients: A population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Using machine learning for predicting intensive care unit resource use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The effects of adding quinolones to beta-lactam antibiotics for sepsis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Motivated by a new randomized trial (the PEPTIC trial) that raised the issue of an increase in mortality with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) relative to histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), we updated our prior systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) addressing the impact of pharmacological gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients.

METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis with PPIs, H2RAs, or sucralfate versus one another or placebo or no prophylaxis in adult critically ill patients. We performed Bayesian random-effects NMA and conducted analyses using all PEPTIC data as well as a restricted analysis using only PEPTIC data from high compliance centers. We used the GRADE approach to quantify absolute effects and assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS: Seventy-four trials enrolling 39 569 patients proved eligible. Both PPIs (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% credible interval 0.93 to 1.14, moderate certainty) and H2RAs (RR 0.98, 0.89 to 1.08, moderate certainty) probably have little or no impact on mortality compared with no prophylaxis. There may be no important difference between PPIs and H2RAs on mortality (RR 1.05, 0.97 to 1.14, low certainty), the 95% credible interval of the complete analysis has not excluded an important increase in mortality with PPIs. Both PPIs (RR 0.46, 0.29 to 0.66) and H2RAs (RR 0.67, 0.48 to 0.94) probably reduce clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding; the magnitude of reduction is probably greater in PPIs than H2RAs (RR 0.69, 0.45 to 0.93), and the difference may be important in higher, but not lower bleeding risk patients. PPIs (RR 1.08, 0.88 to 1.45, low certainty) and H2RAs (RR 1.07, 0.85 to 1.37, low certainty) may have no important impact on pneumonia compared with no prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION: This updated NMA confirmed that PPIs and H2RAs are most likely to have a similar effect on mortality compared to each other and compared to no prophylaxis; however, the possibility that PPIs may slightly increase mortality cannot be excluded (low certainty evidence). PPIs and H2RAs probably achieve important reductions in clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding; for higher bleeding risk patients, the greater benefit of PPIs over H2RAs may be important. PPIs or H2RAs may not result in important increases in pneumonia but the certainty of evidence is low.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume46
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1987-2000
Number of pages14
ISSN0342-4642
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

ID: 61233781