Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Oncology to specialised palliative home care systematic transition: the Domus randomised trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Bereaved caregivers of patients with high-grade glioma: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia: the COVID STEROID randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Ongoing and future COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials: challenges and opportunities

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the content of interventions provided in early specialised palliative care (SPC).

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the content of interventions delivered in early SPC in the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT), a multicentre trial with six participating sites.

METHODS: A retrospective qualitative and quantitative study coding all new interventions initiated by the palliative teams and documented in the medical records during the 8-week study period of DanPaCT. Interventions were categorised according to (a) symptom/problem prompting the intervention, (b) type of intervention and (c) professional(s) providing the intervention.

RESULTS: In total, 145 patients were randomised to the SPC teams. According to the medical records, patients received a median of 3.5 (range 0-22) new interventions in the 8-week intervention-period from the palliative teams. For 24 (18%) of the patients there was no documented interventions in the medical records. The most frequent symptom/problems treated were pain, (100 interventions; 20% of interventions given) and impaired physical function (62; 13% of interventions given). The most frequent type of intervention was pharmacological (232; 42% of interventions given).

CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to meticulously investigate the content of interventions documented in the medical records for patients receiving early SPC. Diverse symptoms were treated with many different interventions. However, a relatively low number of interventions were documented. This may explain the lack of effect in DanPaCT but also questions whether all interventions were adequately documented TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01348048.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume11
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)444-453
Number of pages10
ISSN2045-435X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

    Research areas

  • cancer, drug administration, pain, pharmacology, service evaluation, symptoms and symptom management

ID: 59623078