Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Discordance Between Glucose Levels Measured in Interstitial Fluid vs in Venous Plasma After Oral Glucose Administration: A Post-Hoc Analysis From the Randomised Controlled PRE-D Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Prevalence of Pathogenic Germline DICER1 Variants in Young Individuals Thyroidectomised Due to Goitre - A National Danish Cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Serum Concentrations and Gonadal Expression of INSL3 in Eighteen Males With 45,X/46,XY Mosaicism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Kristine Færch
  • Hanan Amadid
  • Lea Bruhn
  • Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen
  • Adam Hulman
  • Mathias Ried-Larsen
  • Martin Bæk Blond
  • Marit Eika Jørgensen
  • Dorte Vistisen
View graph of relations

Aims: The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is together with haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) gold standard for diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between glucose values obtained from venous plasma versus interstitial fluid after oral glucose administration in 120 individuals with prediabetes and overweight/obesity.

Methods: 120 adults with prediabetes defined by HbA1c 39-47 mmol/mol and overweight or obesity who participated in the randomised controlled PRE-D trial were included in the study. Venous plasma glucose concentrations were measured at 0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes during a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed on three different occasions within a 26 weeks period. During the OGTT, the participants wore a CGM device (IPro2, Medtronic), which assessed glucose concentrations every five minutes.

Results: A total of 306 OGTTs with simultaneous CGM measurements were obtained. Except in fasting, the CGM glucose values were below the OGTT values throughout the OGTT period with mean (SD) differences of 0.2 (0.7) mmol/L at time 0 min, -1.1 (1.3) at 30 min, -1.4 (1.8) at 60 min, and -0.5 (1.1) at 120 min). For measurements at 0 and 120 min, there was a proportional bias with an increasing mean difference between CGM and OGTT values with increasing mean of the two measurements.

Conclusions: Due to poor agreement between the OGTT and CGM with wide 95% limits of agreement and proportional bias at 0 and 120 min, the potential for assessing glucose tolerance in prediabetes using CGM is questionable.

Original languageEnglish
Article number753810
JournalFrontiers in Endocrinology
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Færch, Amadid, Bruhn, Clemmensen, Hulman, Ried-Larsen, Blond, Jørgensen and Vistisen.

    Research areas

  • Bland-Altman, continuous glucose monitor system, oral glucose challenge test, prediabetes, proportional bias

ID: 69007539