Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Differences in cardiovascular risk profile between electrocardiographic hypertrophy versus strain in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (from SEAS data)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Add-on therapy in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk: a nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Age-specific trends in incidence and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from presumed cardiac cause in Denmark 2002-2014

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Early and late risk of ischemic stroke after TAVR as compared to a nationwide background population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Valve regurgitation in patients surviving endocarditis and the subsequent risk of heart failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
Electrocardiograms are routinely obtained in clinical follow-up of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). The association with aortic valve, left ventricular (LV) response to long-term pressure load, and clinical covariates is unclear and the clinical value is thus uncertain. Data from clinical examination, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram in 1,563 patients in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study were used. Electrocardiograms were Minnesota coded for arrhythmias and atrioventricular and intraventricular blocks; LV hypertrophy was assessed by Sokolow-Lyon voltage and Cornell voltage-duration criteria; and strain by T-wave inversion and ST-segment depression. Degree of AS severity was evaluated by echocardiography as peak aortic jet velocity and LV mass was indexed by body surface area. After adjustment for age, gender, LV mass index, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, blood glucose, digoxin, antiarrhythmic drugs, drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system, diuretics, β blockers and calcium receptor blockers; peak aortic jet velocity was significantly greater in patients with electrocardiographic strain (mean difference 0.13 m/s, p
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume108
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)541-7
Number of pages7
ISSN0002-9149
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Research areas

  • Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors

ID: 33117851