Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Development of knowledge tests for multi-disciplinary emergency training: a review and an example

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. A descriptive study of the surge response and outcomes of ICU patients with COVID-19 during first wave in Nordic countries

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19: a post-hoc sub-group analysis of the HOT-ICU trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Supplemental Oxygen for Traumatic Brain Injury - A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. The long-term effects of lower versus higher oxygenation levels in adult ICU patients - protocol for a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Six Sigma in surgery: how to create a safer culture in the operating theatre using innovative technology

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  2. How often will midwives and obstetricians experience obstetric emergencies or high-risk deliveries: a national cross-sectional study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Sleep in hospitalized children and adolescents: A scoping review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Reduction in maternal mortality in Denmark over three decades

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The literature is sparse on written test development in a post-graduate multi-disciplinary setting. Developing and evaluating knowledge tests for use in multi-disciplinary post-graduate training is challenging. The objective of this study was to describe the process of developing and evaluating a multiple-choice question (MCQ) test for use in a multi-disciplinary training program in obstetric-anesthesia emergencies.

METHODS: A multi-disciplinary working committee with 12 members representing six professional healthcare groups and another 28 participants were involved. Recurrent revisions of the MCQ items were undertaken followed by a statistical analysis. The MCQ items were developed stepwise, including decisions on aims and content, followed by testing for face and content validity, construct validity, item-total correlation, and reliability.

RESULTS: To obtain acceptable content validity, 40 out of originally 50 items were included in the final MCQ test. The MCQ test was able to distinguish between levels of competence, and good construct validity was indicated by a significant difference in the mean score between consultants and first-year trainees, as well as between first-year trainees and medical and midwifery students. Evaluation of the item-total correlation analysis in the 40 items set revealed that 11 items needed re-evaluation, four of which addressed content issues in local clinical guidelines. A Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 for reliability was found, which is acceptable.

CONCLUSION: Content and construct validity and reliability were acceptable. The presented template for the development of this MCQ test could be useful to others when developing knowledge tests and may enhance the overall quality of test development.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume59
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)123-33
Number of pages11
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

ID: 44933495