Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparison of the analgesic effect of an adductor canal block using a new suture-method catheter vs. standard perineural catheter vs. single-injection: a randomised, blinded, controlled study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. From variance to guidance for awake tracheal intubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Red blood cell transfusion in surgery: an observational study of the trends in the USA from 2011 to 2016

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Variation in the practice of tracheal intubation in Europe after traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good?

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  • T S Lyngeraa
  • P Jaeger
  • B Gottschau
  • B Graungaard
  • A M Rossen-Jørgensen
  • I Toftegaard
  • U Grevstad
View graph of relations

We performed a randomised, blinded, controlled study with adult patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. The aim was to investigate the analgesic effects of adductor canal block using catheter-based repeated boluses, either through a new suture-method catheter or a standard perineural catheter, compared with a single-injection technique. All patients received an adductor canal block after surgery with an initial bolus of 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%, followed by 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% every 8 h in the standard and suture-method catheter groups, and sham boluses for the single-injection group. The primary outcome measure was total opioid consumption (intravenous morphine equivalents) from the end of surgery until 12:00 on postoperative day 2. Secondary outcomes were pain, muscle strength and ambulation. We randomly assigned (1:1:1) and analysed 153 patients. Total opioid consumption was median (IQR [range]) 24 (11-37 [0-148]) mg in the suture-method group, 38 (17-51 [0-123]) mg in the standard catheter group and 37 (14-57 [0-158]) mg in the single-injection group (p = 0.049). Differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05/3). There were no differences between groups on postoperative day 1. On postoperative day 2, there were no differences between catheter groups, but muscle strength and ambulation were improved compared with the single-injection group. We conclude that providing repeated boluses via a catheter did not decrease opioid consumption or pain compared with a single injection, but improved muscle strength and ambulation on postoperative day 2. The two types of catheters were similar.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume74
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1397-1405
Number of pages9
ISSN0003-2409
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    Research areas

  • Aged, Analgesia/methods, Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Catheters, Female, Humans, Injections, Male, Nerve Block/instrumentation, Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy, Ropivacaine/administration & dosage, Single-Blind Method, Sutures, Treatment Outcome, regional anaesthesia, saphenous nerve block, total knee replacement, femoral nerve block

ID: 58240244