Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparative effectiveness of two adalimumab biosimilars in 1318 real-world patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease mandated to switch from originator adalimumab: nationwide observational study emulating a randomised clinical trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Rheumatology: Biosimilars are here to stay

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  2. Assessment of immunogenicity and drug activity in patient sera by flow-induced dispersion analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Waiting for JAK inhibitor safety data

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Doppler ultrasound predicts successful discontinuation of biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: In 2018, a nationwide mandatory switch from originator to biosimilar adalimumab was conducted in Denmark. The available biosimilar was GP2017 (Hyrimoz) in Eastern regions and SB5 (Imraldi) in Western regions. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of GP2017 versus SB5 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/psoriatic arthritis (PsA)/axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).

METHODS: Observational cohort study based on the DANBIO registry with geographical cluster pseudo-randomisation, analysed by emulating a randomised clinical trial. Main outcome was adjusted 1-year treatment retention (Cox regression). Furthermore, 6 months' remission rates (logistic regression), reasons for withdrawal and back-switching to originator were investigated (overall and stratified by indication).

RESULTS: Overall, of 1570 eligible patients, 1318 switched and were included (467 RA/321 PsA/530 AxSpA); 623 (47%) switched to GP2017, 695 (53%) to SB5. Baseline characteristics of the two clusters were largely similar, but some differences in registration practice were observed. The combined 1-year retention rate for the two biosimilars was 89.5%. Compared with SB5, estimated risk of withdrawal for GP2017 was lower (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.86) and 6 months' remission rate was higher (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.37). Stratified analyses gave similar results (statistically significant for RA). During 1 year, 8.5% and 12.9% withdrew GP2017 and SB5, respectively (primarily lack of effect and adverse events), of whom 48 patients (3.6%) back-switched.

CONCLUSION: This head-to-head comparison of GP2017 versus SB5 following a mandatory switch from the originator indicated differences in effectiveness in routine care. This may reflect a true difference, but other explanations, for example, differences in excipients, differences between clusters and residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume80
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1400-1409
Number of pages10
ISSN0003-4967
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

COPECARE

    Research areas

  • Adalimumab/therapeutic use, Adult, Aged, Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use, Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy, Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use, Cohort Studies, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Denmark, Drug Substitution, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Medication Adherence, Middle Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Registries, Spondylarthropathies/drug therapy, Treatment Outcome

ID: 70410010