Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate: A nationwide cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Time trends in incidence, comorbidity, and mortality of ischemic stroke in Denmark, 1996-2016

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinical characterization of delayed alcohol-induced headache: A study of 1,108 participants

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Evaluation of inflammatory lesions over 2 years in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Permanent muscle weakness in hypokalemic periodic paralysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Intrarater reliability and validity of outcome measures in myotonic dystrophy type 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Functional-structural assessment of the optic pathways in patients with optic neuritis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. MAIT cell subtypes in multiple sclerosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Early Intrathecal T Helper 17.1 Cell Activity in Huntington Disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To compare on-treatment efficacy and discontinuation outcomes in teriflunomide (TFL) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a real-world setting.

METHODS: We identified all patients starting TFL or DMF from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry and compared on-treatment efficacy outcomes between DMF using TFL, adjusted for clinical baseline variables and propensity score-based methods.

RESULTS: We included 2,236 patients in the study: 1,469 patients on TFL and 767 on DMF. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in TFL and DMF were 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.20) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.07-0.12), respectively. Relapse rate ratio for DMF/TFL was 0.58 (95% CI 0.46-0.73, p < 0.001). DMF had a higher relapse-free survival proportion at 48 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). We observed no difference in Expanded Disability Status Scale score worsening. Discontinuations due to disease breakthrough were 10.2% (95% CI 7.6%-12.8%) and 22.1% (95% CI 19.2%-25.0%) for DMF and TFL, respectively. A subgroup analysis of ARRs in 708 patients with available baseline MRI T2 lesion amount reported similar results after adjustment.

CONCLUSION: We found lower ARR, higher relapse-free survival, and lower incidence of discontinuation due to disease breakthrough on treatment with DMF compared with TFL.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with RRMS, DMF is more effective in preventing relapses and has lower discontinuation due to disease breakthrough compared with TFL.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeurology
Volume92
Issue number16
Pages (from-to)e1811-e1820
ISSN0028-3878
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 57586478