Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Optimizing quantitative fluorescence angiography for visceral perfusion assessment

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. A novel assessment tool for evaluating competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Simulation-based training for flexible cystoscopy - A randomized trial comparing two approaches

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Implementering af evidensbaseret simulationstræning

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Examining validity evidence for a simulation-based assessment tool for basic robotic surgical skills

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Gathering Validity Evidence for Surgical Simulation: A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Virtual reality simulators combined with head-mounted displays enable highly immersive virtual reality (VR) for surgical skills training, potentially bridging the gap between the simulation environment and real-life operating room conditions. However, the increased complexity of the learning situation in immersive VR could potentially induce high cognitive load thereby inhibiting performance and learning. This study aims to compare cognitive load and performance in immersive VR and conventional VR simulation training. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of residents (n = 31) performing laparoscopic salpingectomies with an ectopic pregnancy in either immersive VR or conventional VR simulation. Cognitive load was estimated by secondary-task reaction time at baseline, and during nonstressor and stressor phases of the procedure. Simulator metrics were used to evaluate performance. Results: Cognitive load was increased by 66% and 58% during immersive VR and conventional VR simulation, respectively (p < 0.001), compared to baseline. A light stressor induced a further increase in cognitive load by 15.2% and a severe stressor by 43.1% in the immersive VR group compared to 23% (severe stressor) in the conventional VR group. Immersive VR also caused a significantly worse performance on most simulator metrics. Conclusion: Immersive VR simulation training induces a higher cognitive load and results in a poorer performance than conventional VR simulation training in laparoscopy. High extraneous load and element interactivity in the immersive VR are suggested as mechanisms explaining this finding. However, immersive VR offers some potential advantages over conventional VR such as more real-life conditions but we only recommend introducing immersive VR in surgical skills training after initial training in conventional VR.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
ISSN0930-2794
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

    Research areas

  • Cognitive load, Head-mounted device, Immersive virtual reality, Laparoscopic surgical skills training, Simulation

ID: 57584806