Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Brain tumour diagnostics using a DNA methylation-based classifier as a diagnostic support tool

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Leukodystrophy as a feature of PIGT-CDG

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. First report of the neuropathological findings in a patient with leukodystrophy and compound heterozygous variants in the PIGT gene

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Differences in distribution and regulation of astrocytic aquaporin-4 in human and rat hydrocephalic brain

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Pathologic Characteristics of Pregnancy-Related Meningiomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • L P Priesterbach-Ackley
  • H B Boldt
  • J K Petersen
  • N Bervoets
  • D Scheie
  • B P Ulhøi
  • M Gardberg
  • T Brännström
  • S H Torp
  • E Aronica
  • B Küsters
  • W F A den Dunnen
  • F Y F L de Vos
  • P Wesseling
  • W W J de Leng
  • B W Kristensen
View graph of relations

AIMS: Methylation profiling (MP) is increasingly incorporated in the diagnostic process of central nervous system (CNS) tumours at our centres in The Netherlands and Scandinavia. We aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of MP as a support tool for CNS tumour diagnostics.

METHODS: About 502 CNS tumour samples were analysed using (850 k) MP. Profiles were matched with the DKFZ/Heidelberg CNS Tumour Classifier. For each case, the final pathological diagnosis was compared to the diagnosis before MP.

RESULTS: In 54.4% (273/502) of all analysed cases, the suggested methylation class (calibrated score ≥0.9) corresponded with the initial pathological diagnosis. The diagnosis of 24.5% of these cases (67/273) was more refined after incorporation of the MP result. In 9.8% of cases (49/502), the MP result led to a new diagnosis, resulting in an altered WHO grade in 71.4% of these cases (35/49). In 1% of cases (5/502), the suggested class based on MP was initially disregarded/interpreted as misleading, but in retrospect, the MP result predicted the right diagnosis for three of these cases. In six cases, the suggested class was interpreted as 'discrepant but noncontributory'. The remaining 33.7% of cases (169/502) had a calibrated score <0.9, including 7.8% (39/502) for which no class indication was given at all (calibrated score <0.3).

CONCLUSIONS: MP is a powerful tool to confirm and fine-tune the pathological diagnosis of CNS tumours, and to avoid misdiagnoses. However, it is crucial to interpret the results in the context of clinical, radiological, histopathological and other molecular information.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Volume46
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)478-492
Number of pages15
ISSN0305-1846
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 62326767