Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Auditory brainstem response - a valid and cost-effective screening tool for vestibular schwannoma?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Submandibular ectopic thyroid tissue and concurrent thyroid hemiagenesis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinicopathologic characteristics of Burkitt lymphoma of the head and neck in a non-endemic region-a Danish nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The impact of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Assessing competence in cochlear implant surgery using the newly developed Cochlear Implant Surgery Assessment Tool

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cochlear implantation in Branchiootorenal syndrome - case report and review of the literature

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Valid and Reliable Assessment of Upper Respiratory Tract Specimen Collection Skills during the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Vestibular Function in Pendred Syndrome: Intact High Frequency VOR and Saccular Hypersensitivity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

CONCLUSION: Contemporary auditory brainstem response (ABR) is not valid as a screening tool for VS, when considering the sensitivity of 80%, the specificity of 77%, and the positive predictive value of 3.4%, MRI screening is superior to ABR in Denmark when considering cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness of ABR vs MRI, when screening for VS in a clinical setting.

METHOD: Data was collected on all patients subjected to an ABR during a 3-year period (2005-2008) at a tertiary referral center. The data were compared to results of MRI and with data from The Danish National VS Database. In total, 1447 adults underwent ABR, of whom 349 were referred for a subsequent MRI. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. To assess the cost-effectiveness of ABR vs MRI, procedure costs for ABR and MRI were retrieved from the National Board of Health.

RESULTS: Twelve (3.4%) of 349 patients were diagnosed with a VS. Of the 1098 patients not referred for MRI, three (0.3%) were later diagnosed with a VS. The sensitivity and specificity of ABR in diagnosing a VS were 80% and 77%, respectively. Procedure costs were 326 EURO for the ABR and 319 EURO for the MRI.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume136
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)660-2
Number of pages3
ISSN0001-6489
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 49660133