Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Assessment of Residents Readiness to Perform Lumbar Puncture: A Validation Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Charlson Comorbidity Index Score and Risk of Severe Outcome and Death in Danish COVID-19 Patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  2. Low use and adherence to maintenance medication in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the general population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Lead-time models should not be used to estimate overdiagnosis in cancer screening

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Gastrointestinal events with clopidogrel: a nationwide population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Impact of tobacco use on corneal thickness and endothelial health: a systematic review with meta-analyses

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Driving vision in patients with neovascular AMD in anti-VEGF treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Elevated blood cell counts and vascular disease with the myeloproliferative neoplasms as model diseases

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture is a common procedure in many specialties. The procedure serves to diagnose life-threatening conditions, often requiring rapid performance. However, junior doctors possess uncertainties regarding performing the procedure and frequently perform below expectations. Hence, proper training and assessment of performance is crucial before entering clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and collect validity evidence for an assessment tool for lumbar puncture performance, including a standard to determine when trainees are ready for clinical practice.

DESIGN: Development of a new tool, based on clinician interviews and a literature review, was followed by an explorative study to gather validity evidence.

PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN MEASURES: We interviewed 12 clinicians from different specialties. The assessment tool was used to assess 11 doctors at the advanced beginners' level and 18 novices performing the procedure in a simulated, ward-like setting with a standardized patient. Procedural performance was assessed by three content experts. We used generalizability theory to explore reliability. The discriminative ability of the tool was explored by comparing performance scores between the two groups. The contrasting groups method was used to set a pass/fail standard and the consequences of this was explored.

KEY RESULTS: The interviews identified that in addition to the technical aspects of the procedure, non-technical elements involving planning and conducting the procedure are important. Cronbach's alpha = 0.92, Generalizability-coefficient was 0.88 and a Decision-study found one rater was sufficient for low-stakes assessments (G-coefficient 0.71). The discriminative ability was confirmed by a significant difference between the mean scores of novices, 40.9 (SD 6.1) and of advanced beginners, 47.8 (SD 4.0), p = 0.004. A standard of 44.0 was established which was consistent with the raters' global judgments of pass/fail.

CONCLUSION: We developed and demonstrated strong validity evidence for the lumbar puncture assessment tool. The tool can be used to assess readiness for practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)610-618
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 50689425