Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Assessing assumptions for statistical analyses in randomised clinical trials

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Updated 2018 NICE guideline on pharmacological treatments for people with ADHD: a critical look

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Network meta-analysis: the highest level of medical evidence?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Redefining the 'E' in EBM

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

In order to ensure the validity of results of randomised clinical trials and under some circumstances to optimise statistical power, most statistical methods require validation of underlying statistical assumptions. The present paper describes how trialists in major medical journals report tests of underlying statistical assumptions when analysing results of randomised clinical trials. We also consider possible solutions how to improve current practice by adequate reporting of tests of underlying statistical assumptions. We conclude that there is a need to reach consensus on which underlying assumptions should be assessed, how these underlying assumptions should be assessed and what should be done if the underlying assumptions are violated.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)185-189
ISSN1356-5524
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2019

ID: 56951368