Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions: Protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

DOI

  1. Long-term IV access in paediatrics - why, what, where, who and how

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  2. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Continuous peripheral perfusion index in patients admitted to hospital wards - An observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Preferences for the measurement and supplementation of magnesium, phosphate and zinc in ICUs: The international WhyTrace survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Developing and validating COVID-19 adverse outcome risk prediction models from a bi-national European cohort of 5594 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Characteristics, interventions and longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU patients in Denmark - a nationwide, observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Clinical validation of precision medicine protocols: the last mile is the longest

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Buffered crystalloid solutions are increasingly recommended as first-line resuscitation fluids. However, guidelines do not distinguish between different types of buffered solutions. The aim of the outlined systematic review is to summarize and assess the effects of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions on patient-important outcomes.

METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing the use of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions in hospitalized patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations set by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The risk of systematic errors (bias) and random errors will be assessed, and the overall quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION: The outlined systematic review will provide important data on how patient-important outcomes are affected by intravenous administration of acetate- vs lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions in hospitalized patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume65
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)123-127
Number of pages5
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

ID: 61233433