Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Metabolic Systems Analysis of Shock-Induced Endotheliopathy (SHINE) in Trauma: A New Research Paradigm

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prehospital plasma is associated with distinct biomarker expression following injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Endothelial glycocalyx shedding in patients with burns

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • K Baksaas-Aasen
  • L S Gall
  • J Stensballe
  • N P Juffermans
  • N Curry
  • M Maegele
  • A Brooks
  • C Rourke
  • S Gillespie
  • J Murphy
  • R Maroni
  • P Vulliamy
  • H H Henriksen
  • K Holst Pedersen
  • K M Kolstadbraaten
  • M R Wirtz
  • D J B Kleinveld
  • N Schäfer
  • S Chinna
  • R A Davenport
  • P A Naess
  • J C Goslings
  • S Eaglestone
  • S Stanworth
  • P I Johansson
  • C Gaarder
  • K Brohi
Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: Contemporary trauma resuscitation prioritizes control of bleeding and uses major haemorrhage protocols (MHPs) to prevent and treat coagulopathy. We aimed to determine whether augmenting MHPs with Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) would improve outcomes compared to Conventional Coagulation Tests (CCTs).

METHODS: This was a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes in trauma patients who received empiric MHPs, augmented by either VHA or CCT-guided interventions. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects who, at 24 h after injury, were alive and free of massive transfusion (10 or more red cell transfusions). Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality. Pre-specified subgroups included patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

RESULTS: Of 396 patients in the intention to treat analysis, 201 were allocated to VHA and 195 to CCT-guided therapy. At 24 h, there was no difference in the proportion of patients who were alive and free of massive transfusion (VHA: 67%, CCT: 64%, OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.76-1.73). 28-day mortality was not different overall (VHA: 25%, CCT: 28%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31), nor were there differences in other secondary outcomes or serious adverse events. In pre-specified subgroups, there were no differences in primary outcomes. In the pre-specified subgroup of 74 patients with TBI, 64% were alive and free of massive transfusion at 24 h compared to 46% in the CCT arm (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.84-5.34).

CONCLUSION: There was no difference in overall outcomes between VHA- and CCT-augmented-major haemorrhage protocols.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIntensive Care Medicine
ISSN0342-4642
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 13 okt. 2020

ID: 61052507