Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Validation of the Endoscopic Part of the Spigelman Classification for Evaluating Duodenal Adenomatosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Prospective Study of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Long-term Consequences of Undiagnosed Celiac Seropositivity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Validation of Risk Scoring Systems in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Who is wrong? Responses to Kwo et al

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  1. Personalized circulating tumor DNA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Morbidity and mortality after liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: a cohort study in a high-volume fast-track programme

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts complications after liver transplantation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • John Gásdal Karstensen
  • Steffen Bülow
  • Johan Burisch
  • Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
  • Marcin Ostapiuk
  • Hans Christian Pommergaard
  • Palle Nordblad Schmidt
Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the Spigelman classification is recommended for staging and risk stratification of duodenal adenomatosis. Although the classification has been used for decades, it has never been formally validated.

METHODS: We included consecutive FAP patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic surveillance and evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Spigelman classification.

RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the endoscopic parameters and the Spigelman classification was good and excellent, respectively. The intrarater reliability of the endoscopic parameters and the Spigelman classification was moderate and good, respectively.

DISCUSSION: The results support continued use of the Spigelman classification as the primary end point for future studies and as key endoscopic performance measure.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer0000000000001582
TidsskriftThe American journal of gastroenterology
Vol/bind117
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)343-345
Antal sider3
ISSN0002-9270
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2022

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.

ID: 70540635