Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Unreported exclusion and sampling bias in interpretation of randomized controlled trials in patients with STEMI

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Women with coronary microvascular dysfunction and no obstructive coronary artery disease have reduced exercise capacity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Mortality and morbidity of major congenital heart disease related to general prenatal screening for malformations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. An echocardiographic substrate for dyspnea identifies high risk patients with type 2 diabetes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Time in therapeutic range and risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Interaction of ischaemic postconditioning and thrombectomy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: To assess the impact of sampling bias due to reported as well as unreported exclusion of the target population in a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical characteristics and mortality between participants in the DANAMI-3 trial to contemporary non-participants with STEMI using unselected registries. A total of 179 DANAMI-3 participants (8%) and 617 contemporary non-participants (22%) had died (Log-Rank: P < 0.001) after a median follow-up of 1333 days (range: 1-2021 days). In an unadjusted Cox regression model all groups of non-participants had a higher hazard ratio to predict mortality compared to participants: eligible excluded (n = 144) (hazard ratio: 3.41 (95% CI: (2.69-4.32)), ineligible excluded (n = 472) (hazard ratio: 3.42 (95% CI: (2.44-4.80), eligible non-screened (n = 154) (hazard ratio: 3.37 (95% CI: (2.36-4.82)), ineligible non-screened (n = 154) (hazard ratio: 6.48 (95% CI: (4.77-8.80).

CONCLUSION: Sampling bias had occurred due to both reported and unreported exclusion of eligible patients and the difference in mortality between participants and non-participants could not be explained only by the trial exclusion criteria. Thus, screening logs may not be suited to address the risks of sampling bias.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Cardiology
Vol/bind289
Sider (fra-til)1-5
Antal sider5
ISSN0167-5273
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 aug. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 58230092