Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The Yusuf-Peto method was not a robust method for meta-analyses of rare events data from antidepressant trials

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) did not improve responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes on quality of life

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Overall bias and sample sizes were unchanged in ICU trials over time: a meta-epidemiological study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Suspicions of possible vaccine harms must be scrutinised openly and independently to ensure confidence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Benefits and harms of antipsychotic drugs in drug-naïve patients with psychosis: A systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify the validity of effect estimates for serious rare adverse events in clinical study reports of antidepressants trials, across different meta-analysis methods.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Four serious rare adverse events (all-cause mortality, suicidality, aggressive behavior, and akathisia) were meta-analyzed using different methods. The Yusuf-Peto odds ratio ignores studies with no events and was compared with the alternative approaches of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), conditional logistic regression, a Bayesian approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and a beta-binomial regression model.

RESULTS: The estimates for the four outcomes did not change substantially across the different methods; the Yusuf-Peto method underestimated the treatment harm and overestimated its precision, especially when the estimated odds ratio deviated greatly from 1. For example, the odds ratio for suicidality for children and adolescents was 2.39 (95% confidence interval = 1.32-4.33), using the Yusuf-Peto method but increased to 2.64 (1.33-5.26) using conditional logistic regression, to 2.69 (1.19-6.09) using beta-binomial, to 2.73 (1.37-5.42) using the GLMM, and finally to 2.87 (1.42-5.98) using the MCMC approach.

CONCLUSION: The method used for meta-analysis of rare events data influences the estimates obtained, and the exclusion of double-zero event studies can give misleading results. To ensure reduction of bias and erroneous inferences, sensitivity analyses should be performed using different methods instead of the Yusuf-Peto approach, in particular the beta-binomial method, which was shown to be superior through a simulation study.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind91
Sider (fra-til)129-136
ISSN0895-4356
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

ID: 51985015