Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

The impact of seropositivity on the effectiveness of biologic anti-rheumatic agents: results from a collaboration of 16 registries

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Delphine S Courvoisier
  • Katarina Chatzidionysiou
  • Denis Mongin
  • Kim Lauper
  • Xavier Mariette
  • Jacques Morel
  • Jacques-Eric Gottenberg
  • Sytske Anne Bergstra
  • Manuel Pombo Suarez
  • Catalin Codreanu
  • Tore K Kvien
  • Maria Jose Santos
  • Karel Pavelka
  • Merete L Hetland
  • Johan Askling
  • Carl Turesson
  • Satoshi Kubo
  • Yoshiya Tanaka
  • Florenzo Iannone
  • Denis Choquette
  • Dan C Nordström
  • Ziga Rotar
  • Galina Lukina
  • Cem Gabay
  • Ronald Van Vollenhoven
  • Axel Finckh
Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: RF and ACPA are used as diagnostic tools and their presence has been associated with clinical response to some biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in RA. This study compared the impact of seropositivity on drug discontinuation and effectiveness of bDMARDs in patients with RA, using head-to-head comparisons in a real-world setting.

METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of 16 observational RA registries. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RA, initiation of treatment with rituximab (RTX), abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ) or TNF inhibitors (TNFis) and available information on RF and/or ACPA status. Drug discontinuation was analysed using Cox regression, including drug, seropositivity, their interaction, adjusting for concomitant and past treatments and patient and disease characteristics and accounting for country and calendar year of bDMARD initiation. Effectiveness was analysed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index evolution over time.

RESULTS: Among the 27 583 eligible patients, the association of seropositivity with drug discontinuation differed across bDMARDs (P for interaction <0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios for seropositive compared with seronegative patients were 1.01 (95% CI 0.95, 1.07) for TNFis, 0.89 (0.78, 1.02)] for TCZ, 0.80 (0.72, 0.88) for ABA and 0.70 (0.59, 0.84) for RTX. Adjusted differences in remission and low disease activity rates between seropositive and seronegative patients followed the same pattern, with no difference in TNFis, a small difference in TCZ, a larger difference in ABA and the largest difference in RTX (Lundex remission difference +5.9%, low disease activity difference +11.6%).

CONCLUSION: Seropositivity was associated with increased effectiveness of non-TNFi bDMARDs, especially RTX and ABA, but not TNFis.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRheumatology (Oxford, England)
Vol/bind60
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)820-828
Antal sider9
ISSN1462-0324
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 feb. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 61799507