Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Self-evaluated competence in trauma reception

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A nationwide study of the quality of surgical guidelines and written patient information

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence of sarcopenia in a Danish geriatric out-patient population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Feasibility and safety of outpatient breast cancer surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: No formal training requirements exist for trauma teams in Denmark. The aim of this study was to investigate the point prevalence level of training and the self-evaluated competence of doctors involved in trauma care.

METHODS: On two nights, all doctors on call at departments involved in trauma care were interviewed and answered a structured questionnaire pertaining to their level of training and self-evaluated level of competence in relevant skills. These skills included the ability to perform diagnostics and interventions as mandated by the Advanced Trauma Life Support and Definitive Surgical Trauma Care curriculums.

RESULTS: All contacted doctors replied to the questionnaire. 58% of doctors were specialists; most often anaesthesiologists (AN) (86%) and doctors working at hospitals with a dedicated trauma centre designation (100%). In total, 45% of orthopaedic (OS) and gastrointestinal surgeons (GS) were specialists. In terms of self-evaluated competence, 95% of AN felt competent performing damage control resuscitation, 82% of OS felt competent performing damage control surgery on extremities, whereas 55% of GS felt competent performing damage control surgery in the abdomen. A total of 20% of the respondents had not attended any relevant trauma course, the majority of these were GS.

CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that, at the point of sampling, trauma reception in Denmark was handled by AN specialists in the majority of cases, but by surgical trainees. Self-perceived competencies evaluation revealed preparedness to perform damage control resuscitation, but discrepancies in the ability to perform surgical damage control procedures.

FUNDING: none.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDanish Medical Journal
Vol/bind64
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)A5420
ISSN2245-1919
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

ID: 52387168