Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Self-Collected versus Healthcare Worker-Collected Swabs in the Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Effect of Liraglutide on Vascular Inflammation Evaluated by [64Cu]DOTATATE

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Optimal Insertion Depth for Nasal Mid-Turbinate and Nasopharyngeal Swabs

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Four-Dimensional Flow MRI of Abdominal Veins: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Capsid-like particles decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicit strong virus neutralization activity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. De novo electrocardiographic abnormalities in persons living with HIV

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Assessment of patients with a suspected cardioembolic ischemic stroke. A national consensus statement

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Is oropharyngeal sampling a reliable test to detect SARS-CoV-2?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of self-collected versus healthcare worker (HCW)-collected swabs for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. Symptomatic individuals referred for SARS-CoV-2 testing were invited to provide mobile-phone video-instructed self-collected oropharyngeal and nasal samples followed by a HCW-collected oropharyngeal sample. All samples were sent for analysis to the same microbiology laboratory, and the number of SARS-CoV-2-positive participants in the two tests was compared. A total of 109 participants were included, and 19 participants had SARS-CoV-2-positive results. The diagnostic sensitivity of the self-collected and HCW-collected swabs was 84.2% and 89.5%, respectively, with an acceptable agreement, Cohens kappa 0.82, p < 0.001. Further, results from a questionnaire answered by the participants found that loss of smell as a self-reported symptom was a strong predictor for a SARS-CoV-2-positive test. In conclusion, we found that self-collected oropharyngeal and nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing can be reliable compared to HCW-collected oropharyngeal samples.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer678
TidsskriftDiagnostics
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer9
ISSN2075-4418
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 sep. 2020

ID: 61231121