Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Risk of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among renal transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent controls

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Endometrial cancer risk after fertility treatment: a population-based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Ovarian and Breast Cancer Risks Associated With Pathogenic Variants in RAD51C and RAD51D

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Adrenal insufficiency in kidney transplant patients during low-dose prednisolone therapy: a cross-sectional case-control study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Gynaecological cancer leads to long-term sick leave and permanently reduced working ability years after diagnosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Prevalence, incidence, and natural history of HPV infection in adult women ages 24 to 45 participating in a vaccine trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, including anal cancer. We investigated the prevalence of anal high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in RTRs compared with immunocompetent controls and risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs.

METHODS: We included 247 RTRs and 248 controls in this cross-sectional study. We obtained anal samples for HPV testing with INNO-LiPA® and performed high-resolution anoscopy on all participants. The participants completed a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual habits. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of histologically confirmed anal HSIL in RTRs versus controls and risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs, stratified by sex and anal high-risk (hr) HPV status, adjusting for age, smoking, lifetime sexual partners, and receptive anal sex.

RESULTS: RTRs had higher anal HSIL prevalence than controls, both among men (6.5% vs 0.8%, ORadjusted=11.21, 95% CI: 1.46-291.17) and women (15.4% vs 4.0%, ORadjusted=6.41, 95% CI: 2.14-24.10). Among those with anal hrHPV, RTRs had higher anal HSIL prevalence than controls (33.8% vs 9.5%, ORadjusted=6.06, 95% CI: 2.16-20.27). Having had receptive anal sex (ORadjusted=6.23, 95% CI, 2.23-19.08) or genital warts (ORadjusted=4.21, 95% CI: 1.53-11.48) were risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs. All HSIL cases occurred in individuals with anal hrHPV.

CONCLUSION: RTRs had increased risk of anal HSIL compared with immunocompetent controls, with particularly high prevalence in female RTRs. Receptive anal sex, previous genital warts and anal hrHPV infection were risk factors for anal HSIL in RTRs. Screening for anal HSIL in RTRs should be considered.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN1058-4838
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 16 jun. 2020

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 60123264