Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Public opinion and legislations related to brain death, circulatory death and organ donation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. CT and MR neuroimaging findings in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis: A national prospective cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. After stroke, apraxia of eyelid opening is associated with high mortality and right hemispheric infarction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Expanding the cerebrovascular phenotype of the p.R258H variant in ACTA2 related hereditary thoracic aortic disease (HTAD)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. A visual rating scale for cingulate island sign on 18F-FDG-PET to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: Data Standards and Statistical Considerations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Central and peripheral nervous system complications of COVID-19: a prospective tertiary center cohort with 3-month follow-up

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Autoimmune Encephalitis Related to Cancer Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: It is poorly understood how public perception of the difference between brain death and circulatory death may influence attitudes towards organ donation. We investigated the public opinion on brain death versus circulatory death and documented inconsistencies in the legislations of countries with different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.

METHODS: Using a crowdsourcing approach, we randomized 1072 participants from 30 countries to a case report of organ donation after brain death or to one following circulatory death. Further, we sampled guidelines from 24 countries and 5 continents.

RESULTS: Of all participants, 73% stated they would be willing to donate all organs, while 16% would want to donate some of their organs. To increase the rate of donations, 47% would agree with organ donation without family consent as the default. Exposure to "brain death" was not associated with a lesser likelihood of participants agreeing with organ donation (82.1%) compared to "circulatory death" (81.9%; relative risk 1.02, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; p = .11). However, participants exposed to "circulatory death" were more certain that the patient was truly dead (87.9% ± 19.7%) than participants exposed to "brain death" (84.1% ± 22.7%; Cohen's d 0.18; p = 0:004). Sampling of guidelines revealed large differences between countries regarding procedures required to confirm brain death and circulatory death, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of organ donation after circulatory death is unlikely to negatively influence the willingness to donate organs, but legislation is still brain death-based in most countries. The time seems ripe to increase the rate of circulatory death-based organ donation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Vol/bind413
Sider (fra-til)116800
ISSN0022-510X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 15 jun. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 61292639