Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Psychometric properties of the Danish Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cardiac disease: results from the DenHeart survey

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Health-related qualify of life, angina type and coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prognostic Impact of Self-Reported Health on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Am I going to die now? Experiences of hospitalisation and subsequent life after being diagnosed with aortic dissection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression symptoms are common among cardiac patients. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is frequently used to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression; however, no study on the validity and reliability of the scale in Danish cardiac patients has been done. The aim, therefore, was to evaluate the psychometric properties of HADS in a large sample of Danish patients with the four most common cardiac diagnoses: ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, heart failure and heart valve disease.

METHODS: The DenHeart study was designed as a national cross-sectional survey including the HADS, SF-12 and HeartQoL and combined with data from national registers. Psychometric evaluation included analyses of floor and ceiling effects, structural validity using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and hypotheses testing of convergent and divergent validity by relating the HADS scores to the SF-12 and HeartQoL. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, and differential item functioning by gender was examined using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS: A total of 12,806 patients (response rate 51%) answered the HADS. Exploratory factor analysis supported the original two-factor structure of the HADS, while confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure consisting of the original depression subscale and two anxiety subscales as suggested in a previous study. There were floor effects on all items and ceiling effect on item 8. The hypotheses regarding convergent validity were confirmed but those regarding divergent validity for HADS-D were not. Internal consistency was good with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 for HADS-A and 0.82 for HADS-D. There were no indications of noticeable differential item functioning by gender for any items.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study supported the evidence of convergent validity and high internal consistency for both HADS outcomes in a large sample of Danish patients with cardiac disease. There are, however, conflicting results regarding the factor structure of the scale consistent with previous research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01926145.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)9
ISSN1477-7525
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 7 jan. 2020

ID: 62330214