Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Patient information in phase I trials: A systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Cell-free DNA in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma - a clinical prospective feasibility study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Correction: Educational delay and attainment in persons with neurofibromatosis 1 in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Identification of Tumor Antigens Among the HLA Peptidomes of Glioblastoma Tumors and Plasma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To review what is known about cancer patients' decisions to enter a phase I trial and how they and their relatives perceive the information they receive when they are invited to participate.

METHODS: This systematic review is based on the principles of "preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses" (PRISMA). A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo databases, supplemented by a search for unpublished literature.

RESULTS: We identified 37 studies for inclusion in this review. Patients' decisions to participate in a phase I trial were influenced by the drug being tested, information procedures, physician-related factors and the patient's individual approach to decision-making. Patients have difficulties correctly repeating the purpose of a phase I trial. In several studies, the majority of the patients expressed expectations of personal benefit from participating. Studies performing analyses of the dialogue demonstrated that the language of the physicians was incomplete. The relatives' perceptions of such information remain unexplored. Most studies had a comprehensive risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients' decisions regarding participation in phase I trials are based on more than the information of the trial. The way patients express the information they have been given could be limited by the applied methods for evaluating this variable. While relatives are expected to be resources for patients entering a phase I trial, this topic has not been investigated.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPsycho-Oncology
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)768-780
ISSN1057-9249
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 51775734