Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Otoacoustic Emissions for Outcome Prediction in Postanoxic Brain Injury

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Measuring Neurobehavioral Disabilities Among Severe Brain Injury Survivors: Reports of Survivors and Proxies in the Chronic Phase

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Influence of Strategic Cortical Infarctions on Pupillary Function

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The Natural History of Hearing Loss in Pendred Syndrome and Non-Syndromic Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Lactate is a Prognostic Factor in Patients Admitted with Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background: Non-invasive, easy-to-use bedside tools to estimate prognosis in unresponsive patients with postanoxic brain injury are needed. We assessed the usefulness of otoacoustic emissions as outcome markers after cardiac arrest. Methods: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) were measured in cardiac arrest patients whose prognosis was deemed to be poor following standard neurological assessment (n = 10). Ten patients with myocardial infarction without prior loss of consciousness served as controls. Results: Compared to controls with myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest patients with poor neurological prognosis had significantly less often preserved DPOAE (9.2 vs. 40.8% positive measurements; OR 0.15 (CI 0.07-0.30); p < 0.0001). Partially preserved DPOAE were noted in 4 cardiac arrest patients. TEOAE were not statistically different between the two groups. Conclusions: Despite their convenience, otoacoustic emissions cannot be used as reliable prognostic markers in cardiac arrest survivors. This is because we identified 4 cases with partially preserved otoacoustic emissions in a sample of 10 unresponsive post-cardiac arrest patients whose neurological condition was so poor that active treatment was withdrawn. However, we suggest that future research should address if decaying outer hair cell function over time may serve as a proxy for evolving ischemic brain damage.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFrontiers in Neurology
Vol/bind9
Sider (fra-til)796
ISSN1664-2295
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 56358192