Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Multiple Testing, Cut-Point Optimization, and Signs of Publication Bias in Prognostic FDG-PET Imaging Studies of Head and Neck and Lung Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Effect of Liraglutide on Vascular Inflammation Evaluated by [64Cu]DOTATATE

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Optimal Insertion Depth for Nasal Mid-Turbinate and Nasopharyngeal Swabs

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Four-Dimensional Flow MRI of Abdominal Veins: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Effect of liraglutide on expression of inflammatory genes in type 2 diabetes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Ceramides and phospholipids are downregulated with liraglutide treatment: results from the LiraFlame randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Effect of Liraglutide on Vascular Inflammation Evaluated by [64Cu]DOTATATE

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Effects of Empagliflozin on Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The SIMPLE Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was proposed as prognostic marker in radiotherapy. Various uptake metrics and cut points were used, potentially leading to inflated effect estimates. Here, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the prognostic value of pretreatment FDG-PET in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with tests for publication bias. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and local control was extracted or derived from the 57 studies included. Test for publication bias was performed, and the number of statistical tests and cut-point optimizations were registered. Eggers regression related to correlation of SUVmax with OS/DFS yielded p = 0.08/p = 0.02 for HNSCC and p < 0.001/p = 0.014 for NSCLC. No outcomes showed significant correlation with SUVmax, when adjusting for publication bias effect, whereas all four showed a correlation in the conventional meta-analysis. The number of statistical tests and cut points were high with no indication of improvement over time. Our analysis showed significant evidence of publication bias leading to inflated estimates of the prognostic value of SUVmax. We suggest that improved management of these complexities, including predefined statistical analysis plans, are critical for a reliable assessment of FDG-PET.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDiagnostics
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1030
Antal sider1
ISSN2075-4418
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 dec. 2020

ID: 62406283