Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Rigshospitalet - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging using sparsely sampled MR navigators: a clinically feasible tool

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. A Nordic survey of CT doses in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. [(123)I]FP-CIT ENC-DAT normal database: the impact of the reconstruction and quantification methods

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Cross-calibration of the Siemens mMR: easily acquired accurate PET phantom measurements, long-term stability and reproducibility

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Dental artifacts in the head and neck region: implications for Dixon-based attenuation correction in PET/MR

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: We present a study performing motion correction (MC) of PET using MR navigators sampled between other protocolled MR sequences during simultaneous PET/MR brain scanning with the purpose of evaluating its clinical feasibility and the potential improvement of image quality.

FINDINGS: Twenty-nine human subjects had a 30-min [(11)C]-PiB PET scan with simultaneous MR including 3D navigators sampled at six time points, which were used to correct the PET image for rigid head motion. Five subjects with motion greater than 4 mm were reconstructed into six frames (one for each navigator) which were averaged to one image after MC. The average maximum motion magnitude observed was 3.9 ± 2.4 mm (1 to 11 mm). Visual evaluation by a nuclear medicine physician of the five subjects' motion corrected rated three of the five images blurred before motion correction, while no images were rated blurred after. The image quality was scored on a scale of 1-5, 5 being best. The score changed from an average of 3.4 before motion correction to 4.0 after. There was no correlation between maximum motion magnitude and rating. Quantitative SUVr scoring did not change markedly with motion correction.

CONCLUSIONS: Sparsely sampled navigators can be used for characterization and correction of head motion. A slight, overall decrease in blurring and an increase in image quality with MC was found, but without impact on clinical interpretation. In future studies with noteworthy motion artifacts, our method is an important and simple-to-use tool to have available for motion correction.

TidsskriftEJNMMI Physics
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)14
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2015

ID: 45735237